Local/State Labor News

Sep 2 2010 - 7:40am

The U.S. Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration has cited J.A.M. Construction Co. Inc., of Middletown for alleged "willful, repeat and serious violations" of excavation safety standards following an inspection at a Newport job site. The contractor faces a total of $69,600 in proposed penalties.


Sep 1 2010 - 1:43pm
/>

Aug 28 2010 - 6:59am

Congressman McGovern is proving no easy target for resurgent GOP


Aug 28 2010 - 6:18am

The 100+ Registered Nurses, members of the Massachusetts Nurses Association who work at North Adams Regional Hospital, North Adams MA, have given official notice to the Hospital for a strike to begin at 6 a.m. on Friday, September 3.  This follows many month of protracted and largely unproductive negotiations with the Hospital’s high-priced “Union Avoidance” consultant.

 

Among the many management proposals still being proposed by management that the nurses find unacceptable are those that would force nurses to accept staffing policies that would require a nurse to work a shift even if not previously scheduled; cancel a shift without notice; send a nurse home in the middle of a shift; require a nurse to work mandated overtime; remove any certainty about how many hours a week a nurse will work or how much money s/he will make; and remove a provision in the nurses’ contract that allows a nurse to decline overtime if she/he is exhausted or ill.

 

As the nurses prepare for the possibility of a strike (negotiations resume on August 31) they are looking for local and regional union and community allies to attend their pre-strike rally on

When: Thursday, Sept. 2, at 5 p.m.

Where: St. Elizabeth’s of Hungary Parish Center (Saint Anthony Drive, North Adams).

 

Here is a Google Map link for directions:  http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8&q=st.+elizabeth's+parish+north+adams&fb=1&gl=us&hq=st.+elizabeth's+parish&hnear=North+Adams,+MA&cid=0,0,15487169268903564906&ei=H2B1TIOYD4W-sAOx1a2gDQ&sa=X&oi=local_result&ct=image&resnum=1&ved=0CBMQnwIwAA

 

Please note that because at least one attendee at this rally who has Multiple Chemical Sensitivities. We are asking people who are coming to the Thursday rally to please refrain from using recently applied chemical hair treatments such as perms, hair straightener/relaxers, coloring and leave in conditioners or scented products such as aftershave, cologne, perfume, hairspray, mousse/gels, highly scented deodorant or soaps.  We also ask that people not smoke prior to the rally, or wear clothing which has been recently dry-cleaned or which is brand new, particularly leather products. 

 

Second, barring a last-minute contract settlement, the nurses are looking for union and community allies to join them on the Hospital picket line (North Adams Regional Hospital is at 71 Hospital Ave.), especially on Friday, September 3 (the strike begins at 6 a.m.) and through the Labor Day weekend.  Firm date/time commitments are best; but drop-ins are always welcome.

 

Here is a Google Map link for directions:  http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8&cid=0,0,14829129033442849820&fb=1&hq=regional+hospital&hnear=North+Adams,+MA&gl=us&daddr=71+Hospital+Avenue,+North+Adams,+MA+01247&geocode=17931512468606757400,42.705939,-73.108405&ei=WZh2TJ-6FsaqlAeq0djtCw&sa=X&oi=local_result&ct=directions-to&resnum=2&ved=0CCIQngIwAQ

 

Please invite family and co-workers to the rally and the picket line.  And please RSVP to this email to let me know if you are planning to attend the Thursday rally and/or the picket line and if you will be bringing anyone with you.  We especially need to know who is planning to attend the rally.

 

In solidarity,

 

Cookie

 

Barbara "Cookie" Cooke, RN

Associate Director

Massachusetts Nurses Association

Region 3 Community Organizer

Cell Phone: 508.345.9219

 

Safe Staffing Saves Lives!


Aug 27 2010 - 8:28am

The two Democratic candidates vying for their party’s nomination for the 10th Congressional District seat locked horns on Social Security and the Cape Wind project in a debate yesterday, two issues the men seemed to disagree on most sharply, while they also traded barbs over their salaries and pensions.

National/World Union News

Sep 2 2010 - 7:05am

As Labor Day approaches, many Americans are breathing a sigh of relief for the extra day off. On a day that celebrates unions and the eight-hour work day, plenty of people are feeling like their hard work isn’t exactly paying off the way it used to.


Sep 2 2010 - 6:56am
2008_USA_Unions.jpg
Kongsberg Automotive workers protest being locked out by management at the Kongsberg Automotive plant in Van Wert, Ohio.

 

 

Many European companies that publicly embrace workers' rights under global labor standards nevertheless undermine workers' rights in their US operations, Human Rights Watch said in a report issued today.


Sep 2 2010 - 6:29am

Sept. 1, 2010

 

Contact:

Office of Public Affairs

202-273-1991

publicinfo@nlrb.gov

www.nlrb.gov

 

 

The National Labor Relations Board has ruled that a union violated its duty of fair representation in requiring nonmember dues objectors to restate their position every year, despite their express desire to have the objection continue from year to year.

 

Under federal labor law, unions and employers may enter into agreements requiring employees represented by a union to pay dues or fees as a condition of employment.  A 1988 Supreme Court ruling in Communications Workers of America v. Beck, held that unions may charge members and nonmembers fees relating to the union’s collective bargaining  and contract administration activities but cannot require nonmembers to pay fees unrelated to collective bargaining (i.e., fees related to the union’s political and other non-representational activities).  Nonmembers have the right to object to paying any portion of dues that is not used for collective bargaining purposes.  Unions must provide notice of this option, and calculate the share of dues money used for collective bargaining purposes.

 

In this case, an employee of Florida-based L-3 Communications Vertex Aerospace LLC, who was represented by the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, had objected to paying full dues. In 2003, he informed the union in writing that he wished his objection to continue indefinitely. The union responded that all dues objections had to be restated annually. When the employee failed to do so, he was charged the full monthly dues for 2004.

 

The question before the Board was whether the union’s requirement was a breach of the union’s duty of fair representation:  whether it was “arbitrary, discriminatory, or in bad faith.”  Chairman Wilma Liebman and Members Craig Becker, found that the annual renewal requirement was “arbitrary” but not discriminatory or in bad faith. In their separate opinion, Members Schaumber and Hayes agreed that the rule was arbitrary but they would also find it discriminatory.  They also disagreed that the duty of fair representation standard was the proper test.  In a dissent, Member Mark Pearce found that the union had presented reasonable justifications for its requirement.

 

The National Labor Relations Board is an independent federal agency vested with the power to safeguard employees’ rights to organize and to determine whether to have unions as their bargaining representative. The agency also acts to prevent and remedy unfair labor practices committed by private sector employers and unions.

 

###

 


Sep 1 2010 - 2:27pm


Aug 31 2010 - 8:59am

Aug 31 2010 - 8:25am

The Steelworkers’ drive for decent wages, working conditions and back pay for 18,000 exploited workers in Los Angeles-area car washes — a drive that produced a federal ruling precisely a year ago — yielded a big victory in court on Aug. 13: The two owners of the most-notorious car wash were sentenced to a year in jail, four years’ probation, ordered to open their records to government probes and will pay tens of thousands of dollars for environmental and safety violations.


Aug 31 2010 - 6:56am

You have to be rich to be poor.

That's what some people who have never lived below the poverty line don't understand.

Put it another way: The poorer you are, the more things cost. More in money, time, hassle, exhaustion, menace. This is a fact of life that reality television and magazines don't often explain.

So we'll explain it here. Consider this a primer on the economics of poverty.


Aug 28 2010 - 6:38am

APWU members vowed to escalate the fight against the Postal Service’s plan to eliminate Saturday mail delivery on the fourth day of the union’s 20th Biennial National Convention, unanimously approving a resolution to engage in “rallies, marches, and pickets” in concert with other unions and public interest organizations.  The declaration also denounced the “forced relocation” of postal workers and other USPS attacks on employees.


Aug 27 2010 - 11:00am

By order of the Fuhrer you have been selected to work overtime


Aug 26 2010 - 6:15am

Although they work for a company that popularized the slogan “Have a Coke and a smile,” Coca-Cola workers are doing more frowning than ever these days.

What Have The Unions Ever Done For Us?

by Dr. Richard A. Levin. Read online for freeby Dr. Richard A. Levin. Read online for free

Mass AFL-CIO Rapid Response

This Proof of Coverage Application allows the public to search workers' compensation insurance coverage information for policies in the Voluntary Market and Assigned Risk

Employee Free Choice Act : New Five-Year Study Shows Employers’ Anti-Union Behavior IntensifiesEmployee Free Choice Act New Five-Year Study Shows Employers’ Anti-Union Behavior Intensifies

Capitalism

WakeUpWalMartcom




LEARN

Click here to read a welcome message to "LEARN WorkFamily" by Gordon Pavy, Director of Collective Bargaining of the AFL-CIO.

Working America's Job Tracker

  

Labor Union Trivia

Think you know your labor history?
Try your luck at these trivia questions from
Dennis' LaborSOLIDARITY
http://www.laborsolid.info/
 

  Employee Free Choice Act: Myth vs. Fact

MYTH: The Employee Free Choice Act abolishes the National Labor Relations Board's "secret ballot" election process.

FACT: The Employee Free Choice Act does not abolish the National Labor Relations Board election process. That process would still be available under the Employee Free Choice Act. The legislation simply enables workers to also form a union through majority sign-up if a majority prefers that method to the NLRB election process. Under current law, workers may only use the majority sign-up process if their employer agrees. The Employee Free Choice Act would make that choice - whether to use the NLRB election process or majority sign-up - a majority choice of the employees, not the employer.

MYTH: The Employee Free Choice Act will increase intimidation and harassment by labor unions against workers.

FACT: Research has found that coercion and pressure actually drop - from both sides - when workers form a union through a majority sign-up process. Beyond this, harassment by unions is not the problem. In a study of a more than 60-year period, the Human Resources Policy Association listed 113 NLRB cases which they claimed involved union deception and/or coercion in obtaining authorization card signatures. Careful examination of those cases, however, reveals that union misconduct was found in only 42 of those 113 claimed cases. By contrast, in 2005 alone, over 30,000 workers received back pay from employers that illegally fired or otherwise discriminated against them for their union activities.

MYTH: The Employee Free Choice Act would require a secret ballot election in order for workers to get rid of a union.

FACT: Under current law, if an employer has evidence, such as cards or a petition, that a majority of workers no longer supports the union, then the employer is required by law to withdraw recognition of the union and stop bargaining, without an election, unless an election is pending. Under current law, the employer can and must withdraw recognition unilaterally, without the consent of the NLRB. The Employee Free Choice Act would not change this.

MYTH: The Employee Free Choice Act would require "public" union card signings.

FACT: Under current law, employees must sign cards or petitions to show their support for a union in order to obtain an election. And, under current law, when an employer agrees to a majority sign-up process, employees must sign cards to show the union's majority status. Signing a card under the Employee Free Choice Act is no different from these card signings under current law. The union authorization card under the Employee Free Choice Act is treated no differently than a petition for election or a card under a majority sign-up agreement. As with petitions for an election, under the Employee Free Choice Act, the National Labor Relations Board would receive the cards and determine their validity.

MYTH: The Employee Free Choice Act's sponsors support secret ballot elections for workers in Mexico, but not in the United States.

FACT: Members of Congress wrote to Mexican authorities in 2001 arguing in favor of a secret ballot election in a case where workers were trying to replace a sham incumbent union with an independent union. The Employee Free Choice Act is consistent with this: it would require an NLRB election in cases where workers seek to replace one union with another union. Indeed, the original framers of the National Labor Relations Act intended elections for precisely those cases where multiple unions were competing - particularly where one was a sham company union and another was a real independent union.

From U.S House of Representatives Committee on Education and Labor

  Why We Need the Employee Free Choice Act

 

Thanks in large part to the efforts of union volunteers around the country, working families won a strong victory on Nov. 4, sending Barack Obama to the White House and electing a stronger pro-worker majority of senators and representatives.

 

However, winning an election isn't the end of the fight. Now, our elected leaders need to tackle the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression. They have to keep their promises to the people who voted for them-and we have to give them the support they need to make the tough choices. We need an economic recovery package that will turn around this broken economy for working families with good jobs, green jobs, re-regulation of our financial system and health care that works for all of us. But no matter what else we do, it won't result in real shared prosperity unless we restore workers' freedom to form unions so they can bargain for a better life with better wages and benefits. That's what this proposed legislation, the Employee Free Choice Act, will do. The Employee Free Choice Act will:

 

  • Put real teeth in the laws that are supposed to bar companies from intimidating, harassing-even firing-workers who want to form unions.
  • Allow workers to form their union when a majority signs cards indicating that's what they desire.
  • Require arbitration to end corporate foot-dragging when workers try to get a first contract.

 

The Employee Free Choice Act will level the playing field that today leaves all the power in the hands of corporations, not workers.

 

And Big Business and the front groups set up by corporations are preparing an all-out, $200 million propaganda and lobbying war to block it.

 

Unions have made passage of the Employee Free Choice Act a top priority for this year because it is the key to good wages, benefits, a voice in the workplace and the amplified political voice unions bring workers. In 2007, the U.S. House passed the measure and it had majority support in the Senate, but a minority killed it with a filibuster, emboldened by President George W. Bush's promise to veto the legislation. Now we have elected a new Congress that has promised to be beside us in this fight and a president who has promised to sign the Employee Free Choice Act.

 

Here are the facts on why we need the Employee Free Choice Act:

 

Working families are struggling. For too long, workers haven't had the power to get their fair share of the value they create. Workers are finding it harder and harder to stay in our homes, pay for our health care and save for our retirement. And our economy is suffering as a result.

 

Unions make people's lives better. The freedom to form unions and bargain for a better life is a basic human right, and it makes a difference: Union members make 30 percent more than workers who don't have unions. They're 59 percent more likely to have health benefits and four times more likely to have pensions. That's real economic security. Communities with strong unions have higher standards of living for everyone.

 

But the system is broken. More than 60 million workers who don't have a union would join one if they could. But under existing law, corporations essentially have a veto over the process. In our company-dominated system, workers can be intimidated, coerced and even fired by their bosses for trying to form a union. A decision that should be in the hands of workers is instead in the hands of corporate executives.

 

Why union members should support the Employee Free Choice Act. The Employee Free Choice Act doesn't just matter for workers who are trying to form unions. When more workers are in unions, workers have greater strength in numbers to demand good wages and good benefits across communities and industries. That raises the living and working standards for all workers and helps us all bargain for better contracts and counterbalance corporate power.

 

The Employee Free Choice Act means long-term shared prosperity. The Employee Free Choice Act is essential to rebuilding the middle class and ensuring the survival of the American Dream. We can build an economy that works for everyone if workers can exercise the freedom to form unions.